Anas Mazdrashki vs Yanaki Milev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Mazdrashki secures 38.46% of second serve points, whereas Milev achieves 43.16%. Does this suggest a clear advantage for Milev? Yes, a better second serve performance indicates a potential edge.
• Return Game Stats: Mazdrashki wins 53.35% of second serve return points, outperforming Milev's 47.54%. On first serve returns, Mazdrashki leads with 36% over Milev's 31.45%. Could superior return stats favor Mazdrashki? Yes, strong return play might tilt the balance.
• Under Pressure: Mazdrashki saves 49.24% of breakpoints, while Milev saves 52.57%. Does Milev perform better under pressure? Milev demonstrates a slight edge in this area.
• Performance Overview: Mazdrashki holds a 41.18% match win rate this past year, while Milev stands at 49.02%. Who shows overall better consistency? Milev maintains a slightly stronger track record.
• Best Surface: Both players excel on Clay; Mazdrashki at 43% and Milev at 58%. Could surface preference heavily influence the outcome? Yes, especially if the match is on clay.
• Player Level: Mazdrashki plays mostly in $10K Futures/Satellites, winning 41.18% of matches, compared to Milev’s 48.72%. Is the level of competition crucial? Certainly, as it reflects experience and competitiveness.
• Opponent Quality: Mazdrashki’s average opponent rank is 521, while Milev faces tougher challenges with an average rank of 343. How does opponent difficulty impact performance? Higher opponent ranks typically indicate better competitive exposure for Milev.
• Deciding Set Performance: In deciding sets, Mazdrashki has a 29% win rate compared to Milev's 50%. Does this suggest an edge for Milev in close matches? Yes, Milev is more reliable in tight finishes.
• Break Point Conversion: Mazdrashki converts 43.3% of breakpoint opportunities, marginally higher than Milev's 40.51%. Can this be a decisive factor? It might indicate Mazdrashki’s potential advantage in breaking serve.

Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performance trends and strengths of both players, we observe that Milev exhibits a slightly superior second serve performance, which could provide him with an essential edge during rallies.

While Mazdrashki demonstrates commendable return game stats, Milev's ability to save breakpoints and perform under pressure gives him a slight upper hand. Additionally, facing stronger opponents more consistently has likely provided Milev with valuable experience.

Despite both players having their best results on clay, Milev has a better winning percentage on this surface, pointing to a possible advantage. Furthermore, his proficiency in deciding sets suggests reliability in challenging moments.

Based on these factual comparisons and analyses, Milev appears more likely to win the upcoming match. However, with the unpredictable nature of tennis, Mazdrashki’s strong return game remains a key factor to watch.